Connect with us

TECHNOLOGY

US blaming China for Microsoft hack is an obvious deflection from the Pegasus spyware scandal

Published

on

With incredibly convenient timing, China has been accused of mounting cyberattacks against Microsoft, taking the attention away from another more serious spying scandal that implicates the US, Israel, and others.

On Monday, the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union accused China of being behind a hack of Microsoft’s servers in March.

Without evidence, the allies said Beijing had been involved in “malicious cyber activity,” although they stopped short of implementing any sanctions. China responded by calling the US the largest instigator of cyberattacks in the world.

The move, led by the US, might be described as deliberately and conveniently timed political theatre, as it coincidentally knocked another emerging cyber scandal out of the headlines.

Just hours before this announcement, a number of newspapers, including The Guardian, had published evidence that highly advanced Israeli spyware called Pegasus – which can infect smartphones and intercept messages, emails, and other communications – had in fact been used on an industrial scale to target activists, journalists, and lawyers around the world.

The program is named Pegasus because it can be installed through the air without needing physical access to the target’s phone. Victims named so far include up to 200 people, many of whom are prominent reporters working for the likes of CNN, the New York Times, and Al Jazeera. The software has been employed by a host of countries, including in Narendra Modi’s India, where it was used to spy on leader of the opposition Rahul Gandhi as well as a number of other politicians. It was also linked to the murder of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

Of course, these revelations will only be the tip of the iceberg. While the scandal has predictably revolved around a series of small authoritarian states and, so far, has low geopolitical implications, the reporting seems to gloss over the fact that Pegasus is meant to be only sold to Western intelligence agencies, and the fuss is more about the ‘wrong’ countries using it rather than how it is likely used to serve the US and its allies. It has even been claimed developer NSO Group was owned by a US venture capital firm.

Yet all this might miss the more significant point that there are dozens of programs that serve these kinds of functions, including those used by the National Security Agency (NSA) of the United States, as this 2019 article sets out. So why wouldn’t it use Pegasus? And it makes you wonder, how many other times have programs such as these been used under the false pretence of ‘human rights’ and ‘national security’ in order to spy on various individuals and groups?

Somewhat predictably, despite America supposedly backing the principle of freedom of the press, Washington and its allies were silent on this shocking revelation, and seemingly instantaneously started to hurl allegations against Beijing to move the news cycle onwards – a tactic that appears to have worked.

But beyond talk of deflection, there are some strategic reasons for attacking China in this manner, too. Joe Biden’s administration fears it is starting to lose the initiative on China among allies and is desperate to try to isolate Beijing further through the tactic of ‘coalition-building’ against it. In addition, it is also determined to try to discredit Chinese technology by linking it to allegations of espionage and malicious behaviour in order to promote public distrust. For example, this Microsoft hack story complements the long-established campaign against Huawei.

But in reality, it is the US that operates the most sophisticated surveillance network in the world, and has capabilities in cyber warfare which are way more advanced than China’s.

The Israeli state – and its own technological prowess – is a keystone of this, as an acknowledged world leader in cutting-edge surveillance tech. That Israel could be implicated in the creation and sale of such malign equipment to ‘unapproved countries’ is not really a surprise, yet the Pegasus scandal will most likely be swept under the carpet and nothing will change.

It was ignored by the media at large that the European Union’s statement on this scandal was actually harsher than the largely benign one Washington had twisted it into making against China, showing the obvious political priorities at stake. But this should be a stark reminder that while hysteria is being propagated about China, it isn’t the one you should be worried about spying on you.

Very simply, this Microsoft stunt is a deflection, and so far there has been no plausible motive put forward as to why the Chinese state would be responsible for taking such a move. Assuming it was a criminal enterprise, why would it have to be enabled by a state?

Of course, it is very much an aspect of modern warfare and the world we live in for states to have sophisticated cyber capabilities. But the Microsoft allegations should be understood as a public relations stunt and an attempt to build unity against China by a Biden administration that increasingly resembles Donald Trump’s and is looking for any means to bash Beijing.

This Microsoft story does not have substance, but the Pegasus scandal does, and that’s why the US is keen to distract people from it. It is only a scandal because the ‘wrong’ governments have it – not that it is perfectly legitimate for Western governments to buy it and use it on their own populations as they please.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

TECHNOLOGY

How much YouTube pays for 1 million views, according to creators

Published

on

  • YouTube creators earn money from Google-placed ads on their videos.
  • A number of factors determine how much money they make, including video views.
  • Creators said how much YouTube pays for 1 million views ranged from $3,400 to $30,000.

While many factors — content niche and country, among them — determine how much money a YouTuber earns on any particular video, the number of views it gets is perhaps the most significant.

When a YouTube video hits 1 million views, there’s almost a guaranteed big payday for its creator. In some cases, creators can make five-figures from a single video if it accrues that many views.

Three creators explained how much money YouTube had paid them. YouTube pays $3,400 to $30,000 for 1 million views, these creators said.

When tech creator Shelby Church spoke with Insider, she had earned $30,000 from a video about Amazon FBA (Fulfillment By Amazon). At the time, the video had accrued 1.8 million views.

Her RPM rate — or earnings per 1,000 views — are relatively high, she said, because of her content niche. Business, personal finance, and technology channels tend to earn more per view.

“YouTubers don’t always make a ton of money, and it really depends on what kind of videos you’re making,” she said.

Influencers can earn 55% of a video’s ad revenue if they are part of YouTube’s Partner Program, or YPP. To qualify for the program, they must have 1,000 subscribers and 4,000 hours of watch time on their long-form videos.

They can also make money from shorts, YouTube’s short-form video offering. In order to qualify, creators need to reach 10 million views in 90 days and have 1,000 subscribers. YouTube pools ad revenue from shorts and pays an undisclosed amount to record labels for music licensing. Creators receive 45% of the remaining money based on their percentage of the total shorts views on the platform.

You can share this story on social media:

PLEASANT MUSIC FOR YOUR CAFE, BAR, RESTAURANT, SWEET SHOP, HOME

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS

Continue Reading

TECHNOLOGY

Tesla employees shared sensitive images recorded by cars – Reuters

Published

on

Some pictures were turned into memes and distributed through internal chats, former workers told the agency

Tesla workers shared “highly invasive” images and videos recorded by customers’ electric cars, making fun of them on internal chat groups, several former employees of Elon Musk’s company have told Reuters.

The electric-car manufacturer obtains consent from its clients to collect data from vehicles in order to improve its self-driving technology. However, the company assures owners that the whole system is “designed from the ground up to protect your privacy,” the agency pointed out in its report on Thursday.

According to nine former workers who talked to the agency, groups of employees shared private footage of customers in Tesla’s internal one-on-one chats between 2019 and 2022.

One of the clips in question captured a man approaching his electric car while he was completely naked, one of the sources said.

Tesla recalls over 360,000 cars over self-driving threat

Others featured crashes and road-rage incidents. One particular video of a Tesla hitting a child on a bike in a residential area spread around the company’s office in San Mateo, California “like wildfire,” an ex-employee claimed.

“I’m bothered by it because the people who buy the car, I don’t think they know that their privacy is, like, not respected… We could see them doing laundry and really intimate things. We could see their kids,” another former worker told the agency.

Seven former employees also told Reuters that the software they used at work allowed them to see the location where the photo or video was made, despite Tesla assuring its customers that “camera recordings remain anonymous and are not linked to you or your vehicle.”

The agency noted that it could not obtain any of the pictures or clips described by its sources, who said they were all deleted. Some former employees also told the journalists that they had only seen private data being shared for legitimate purposes, such as seeking assistance for colleagues. Tesla did not respond when approached for comment on the issue by Reuters.

You can share this story on social media!

PLEASANT MUSIC FOR YOUR CAFE, BAR, RESTAURANT, SWEET SHOP, HOME

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS

Continue Reading

TECHNOLOGY

Nordic nation’s military bans use of TikTok – media

Published

on

Sweden’s Defense Ministry has reportedly barred employees from using the Chinese-owned app on their work phones

Sweden’s military has reportedly cracked down on TikTok, decreeing that staff members are no longer allowed to use the Chinese-owned video-sharing application on their devices at work because of security concerns.

The Swedish Defense Ministry on Monday issued its decision, which was viewed by Agence-France Presse, banning the use of TikTok. Security concerns were raised based on “the reporting that has emerged through open sources regarding how the app handles user information and the actions of the owner company, ByteDance,” the ministry said.

The move follows similar restrictions imposed by other EU countries in recent weeks. For example, France banned government employees from downloading “recreational applications,” including TikTok, on their work phones. Norway barred use of the app on devices that can access its parliament’s computer network, while the UK and Belgium banned it on all government phones. Denmark’s Defense Ministry and Latvia’s Foreign Ministry imposed their TikTok bans earlier this month.

China responds to TikTok allegations

“Using mobile phones and tablets can in itself be a security risk, so therefore we don’t want TikTok on our work equipment,” Swedish Defense Ministry press secretary Guna Graufeldt told AFP.

The US, Canada and New Zealand previously banned their federal employees from using TikTok on government-issued devices, citing fears of ByteDance’s ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Members of Congress may try to ban the app from the US market altogether after testimony at a congressional hearing last week by TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew failed to ease their security concerns. “They’ve actually united Republicans and Democrats out of the concern of allowing the CCP to control the most dominant media platform in America,” US Representative Mike Gallagher said on Sunday in an ABC News interview.

Chinese officials have denied claims that TikTok is used to collect the personal data of its American users. “The Chinese government has never asked and will never ask any company or individual to collect or provide data, information or intelligence located abroad against local laws,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning told reporters last week. She added that Washington has attacked TikTok without providing any evidence that it threatens US security.

PLEASANT MUSIC FOR YOUR CAFE, BAR, RESTAURANT, SWEET SHOP, HOME

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS

Continue Reading

Trending