Connect with us

SCIENCE

UK boast of winning ‘race’ to greenlight Covid-19 vaccine jeopardises pandemic strategy if public is put off by world-first claims

Published

on

Unable to control themselves, UK politicians are bragging about approving a coronavirus vaccine in record time, but experts elsewhere remind us the tough job of convincing 85 percent of the population to take it is far from done

It is hard to determine exactly at what point the hardworking scientists from Pfizer, BioNtech, AstraZeneca, Moderna and Oxford University found themselves in a ‘race’ to find a vaccine, but that is the narrative we’ve been asked to adopt by politicians since the Covid-19 virus seized the world in a chokehold.

What’s missing is an understanding that the vaccine battle is one fought on two fronts: first, finding a vaccine that will do the job, and, second, convincing everyone to take it. Having cracked the first problem, the second suddenly seems like a mountain to climb.

‘World-beating jingoism’: Gavin Williamson sparks Twitter fury by calling UK ‘much better’ than US & EU due to Pfizer jab approval

Hugely respected US immunologist Dr. Anthony Fauci has joined the EU in suggesting that the speed with which Britain won approval from the Medical and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency for the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine may deter people from taking up the offer of immunisation.

“If you go quickly and you do it superficially, people are not going to want to get vaccinated,” was how he put it. That would be a disaster.

All along, the narrative around the hunt for a silver bullet has been that this is all some sort of race. Only, within that narrative, the winners and losers are not the virus and its vaccine, but politicians from nations who see themselves in a competition to be the first to claim bragging rights.

It may be a race in one sense, against the virus itself, and it’s spread through the population. But scientists working day and night on a solution that requires expertise in biology and virology of a level few around the world share should not find themselves unwittingly taking part into a competition between nations. It’s not an Olympic event. It’s science.

But that’s not how British politicians see it. They’ve been unleashed to strut their stuff on the television and brag on Twitter, proclaiming a UK ‘first’ in the ‘race’.

‘The day UK led humanity’s charge against Covid’: Tory MP Sharma mocked for over-the-top cheer as London approves foreign vaccine

Bojo kicked it off by announcing the “biological jiu jitsu” of the vaccine meant we’d be over the virus by spring.

Education Secretary Gavin Williamson said, “We’ve obviously got the best medical regulator, much better than the French have, much better than the Belgians have, much better than the Americans have… we’re a much better country than every single one of them.”

Senior MP Jacob Rees-Mogg told the Parliament, “The UK should be really proud that our regulator got in first. And we notice that the European regulator is a bit sniffy about it, wishes we hadn’t done it, and that Germany and France and other European countries haven’t managed to do the same thing.”

Business Secretary Alok Sharma came over all misty-eyed, claiming, “In years to come, we will remember this moment as the day the UK led humanity’s charge against this disease.”

The UK was the first country to sign a deal with Pfizer/BioNTech – now we will be the first to deploy their vaccineTo everyone involved in this breakthrough: thank youIn years to come, we will remember this moment as the day the UK led humanity’s charge against this disease
— Alok Sharma (@AlokSharma_RDG) December 2, 2020

But, beating them all for jingoism, is Health Secretary Matt Hancock, who says he will have the vaccine jab live on TV.

Germany’s ambassador to the UK wasn’t impressed, tweeting, “Why is it so difficult to recognise this important step forward as a great international effort and success?” Who knows, Mr Ambassador, but these chumps are our leaders!

Why is it so difficult to recognize this important step forward as a great international effort and success. I really don’t think this is a national story. In spite of the German company BioNTech having made a crucial contribution this is European and transatlantic. https://t.co/SE4XDG4P0o
— Andreas Michaelis (@GermanAmbUK) December 2, 2020

The European Union, which is looking for a fully co-ordinated rollout itself, is taking a guarded view, not of the vaccine but of the haste with which it has been approved in the UK.

Maybe they’re right. If we take just one country, and remember, this virus began in a single location, then we should heed Dr Fauci’s warnings on uptake. To stop the pandemic, he believes three out of every four people would need to take the vaccine. He’d be happier if that figure was 85 per cent.

A Gallup poll released in the United States last month had that figure at just 58 per cent.

For my part, I’ll take the vaccine at the first opportunity I have, but I understand not everyone agrees. Getting people to change their minds is the hard part. If our leaders don’t manage that then we have a big problem.

Maybe that’s what they should have been focusing on all this time. Not lockdowns and traffic light systems or finding creative ways to empty the Treasury coffers, but a simple unambiguous campaign to reassure everyone that when a vaccine was unearthed, it would be in their best interests to sign up for a jab and encourage everyone they know to do likewise. It could save their life.

UK wants to use literal army to fight ‘anti-vaccine propaganda’ online. Are we in a budding totalitarian state?

Instead, we’ve had to endure this parade of chest-beating politicians trumpeting victory, and demonstrating a jaw-dropping lack of awareness about how the public sees them. They’re selling triumphalism when they should be building trust around the case for a large-scale vaccination programme, maybe even in consultation with top experts from other nations. Who knows? It might even work.

Somehow, it seems they’re going about this backwards. And the tragic price the rest of us will pay will be in yet more avoidable deaths.

Like this story? Share it with a friend!

SCIENCE

Ohio chemical disaster may hold long-term health risks – experts

Published

on

East Palestine residents remain “in constant contact” with toxic pollutants, a US scientist says

The pollutants in the air of East Palestine, Ohio, may pose long-term health risks, scientists from Texas A&M and Carnegie Mellon University claimed on Wednesday. Their assessment contrasts the US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) assurance that the pollution does not pose an immediate health risk.

Dr. Albert Presto, an associate research professor at Carnegie Mellon University, told CNN on Wednesday that the situation in East Palestine was not an “immediate health concern” but that it could still pose long-term risks as the researchers had no way of telling how long the hazardous chemical concentration would persist. He added that the residents of the city were in “constant contact” with the pollutants and there was no clear understanding of what that level of exposure would mean for the population’s health.

The air in the Ohio city was contaminated in early February, after 38 cars of a Norfolk Southern freight train derailed and spilled out the hazardous materials they were carrying. The accident caused a fire that went on for multiple days and intensified the airborne spread of the chemical pollution, causing a mandatory evacuation of the nearby residents. The EPA has been conducting various tests and measurements in the affected area, claiming there was no immediate risk to the local population.

Another train derails after Ohio chemical spill

Texas A&M and Carnegie Mellon presented their independent assessment in a Twitter post last week. The scientists claim to have used data compiled by the EPA and found that nine of the 50 chemicals found in East Palestine’s air were above the norm for the region. In particular, the report singles out acrolein, a toxic substance used to control plants, algae, rodents and microorganisms.

The EPA responded to the claims in the report from the two universities by dismissing the perceived risks. A spokesperson for the agency told CNN on Monday that the report assumed “a lifetime of exposure, which is constant exposure over approximately 70 years” for the harmful effects to manifest. They added: “EPA does not anticipate levels of these chemicals will stay high for anywhere near that.”

Dr. Ivan Rusyn, the director of the Texas A&M University Superfund Research Center and part of the team that did the analysis, told CNN on Wednesday that “all sides were right” as both parties simply needed to keep monitoring the situation and “do a better job communicating the results.”

PLEASANT MUSIC FOR YOUR CAFE, BAR, RESTAURANT, SWEET SHOP, HOME

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS

Continue Reading

SCIENCE

Seismologist behind Türkiye quake prediction issues another warning

Published

on

Dutch seismologist Frank Hoogerbeets, who rose to international prominence after predicting the devastating earthquakes in Türkiye and Syria last month, has said that the world could be hit with another major quake in the coming days.

Hoogerbeets, who makes his forecasts based on the motions of celestial bodies, published a video on YouTube on Monday in which he warned that “the first week of March is going to be extremely critical.”

“A convergence of critical planetary geometry around March 2 and 5 may result in large to very large seismic activity, possibly even a mega-thrust earthquake around March 3 and 4 and/or March 6 and 7,” the description to the clip read.

In the video itself, the seismologist claimed that the power of the supposed impending quake “may be well over 8 magnitude.”

The affected area could stretch thousands of kilometers, from the Kamchatka Peninsula and the Kuril Islands in Russia’s Far East, all the way down to the Philippines and Indonesia, Hoogerbeets said.

Costs from Türkiye’s massive quake rising

“I’m not exaggerating. I’m not trying to create fear. This is a warning,” insisted the scientist, who works at the Solar System Geometry Survey (SSGEOS).

The head of the Kamchatka branch of the Geophysical Survey of Russia’s Academy of Sciences, Danila Chebrov, has questioned Hoogerbeets’ predictions and described him as an “amateur.” The connection between the movements of the planets in the solar system and seismic activity on Earth “is rather weak, and it’s problematic to use it as the main prognostic tool,” Chebrov explained.

On February 3, Hoogerbeets issued a tweet that read: “Sooner or later there will be a magnitude 7.5 earthquake in this region (South-Central Turkey, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon).”

Three days later, a 7.8 magnitude quake struck Türkiye and Syria. The disaster has caused the deaths of more than 50,000 people, with powerful aftershocks continuing in the region to this day.

Dutch seismologist Hoogerbeets has made predictions down the years which didn’t come true. Commenting on his work earlier this month, Susan Hough of the US Geological Survey insisted that no scientist has “ever predicted a major earthquake.” Hough told NPR that the spot-on forecast for the quakes in Türkiye and Syria was just a coincidence. “It’s the stopped clock that’s right twice a day, basically,” she said.

PLEASANT MUSIC FOR YOUR CAFE, BAR, RESTAURANT, SWEET SHOP, HOME

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS

Continue Reading

SCIENCE

Turkish quakes may be ‘rehearsal’ for big one in Istanbul – scientists

Published

on

A local newspaper cites experts warning of a potential catastrophe if an earthquake hits the country’s biggest city

Istanbul should prepare itself for a powerful quake, scientists and public figures have warned. This month’s disaster in southern Turkey, which claimed tens of thousands of lives, is a “rehearsal” for what could come next, they argued in the newspaper Hurriyet on Friday.

When the next Istanbul earthquake happens, the damage “will swallow everyone,” unless people drop their differences and work on improving the seismic resilience of the city, Turkish author Nedim Sener wrote.

He cited a risk assessment by Bogazici University’s quake research lab, which counted how many buildings would be impacted by an earthquake of 7.5+ magnitude in Türkiye’s most populous and economically vital hub. With almost 13,500 structures expected to be heavily damaged, and hundreds of thousands of others affected to a smaller degree, the loss of life would be greater than what the country has just experienced, Sener predicted.

Some Turkish officials, including Istanbul Mayor Ekrem Imamoglu, have voiced similar concerns. The head of the city administration said 90,000 structures were at risk of total collapse in case of a major earthquake, citing a fresh survey by his municipality.

Cost of Türkiye quake damage estimated

Speaking in a TV interview this week, Imamoglu criticized the central government for issuing an amnesty to some 317,000 buildings which failed to meet earthquake resilience codes. It meant that the owners were allowed to pay a fine rather than demolish their properties.

Istanbul is located near a tectonic fault line that passes under the Marmara Sea. The 1999 quake in Izmit, which killed over 17,000 people, struck some 80 kilometers east of the city center, and half that distance from its easternmost suburbs.

Turkish Seismologist Naci Gorur, from Istanbul Technical University, warned that the risk of a major quake hitting Istanbul in the near future was growing. The probability of a tremor measuring over 7 magnitude occurring near the city within 30 years has increased from 62% in the aftermath of the 1999 disaster to 80% now, he said during a TV appearance. The scientists cited calculations by Tom Parsons, a fellow researcher at the US Geological Survey.

The twin quakes on February 6 caused massive devastation in Türkiye and northern Syria. Their combined death toll is estimated at around 44,000, including over 38,000 on the Turkish side.

SUITABLE MUSIC FOR YOGA LOVERS

PLEASANT MUSIC FOR YOUR CAFE, BAR, RESTAURANT, SWEET SHOP, HOME

Continue Reading

Trending